Last updated: October 22, 2026
ChinaAI publishes free, English-language guides, explainers and comparisons about Chinese AI tools, including DeepSeek, Qwen and Kimi. Our aim is to help readers understand these services, explore practical uses and make informed choices.
This policy sets out the standards we follow when researching, preparing, reviewing and updating our content.
Editorial responsibility
Our content is prepared and reviewed under the name ChinaAI Team. ChinaAI is operated by Thinkly For Digital Business, based in Egypt. The team is responsible for editorial decisions and the material published on this website.
Learn more about our purpose and ownership on our About page.
Research and sources
We use official sources and practical experience with AI tools, depending on the subject and scope of each article. Relevant sources may include provider documentation, help centers, product pages and official announcements.
Our sourcing standards are to:
- Link to primary sources for important product details whenever available.
- Attribute claims and benchmarks to their original source, including whether they come from a provider or an independent study.
- Separate confirmed information from interpretation, estimates and details that remain uncertain.
- Add useful explanation and context while crediting other people’s work.
Practical experience and comparisons
Some articles draw on direct use of a tool; others focus on explaining published information. The article should make its basis clear. We only describe a feature as tested when we have actually used it.
Any reported test result should include enough relevant context to understand its scope, such as the tool or model, task, prompt, access level and date, where known. A limited test supports observations about that task; it does not establish how a tool will perform in every situation.
Comparisons should explain the criteria relevant to the reader’s task, the strengths and limitations observed or documented, and the basis for any recommendation. Provider benchmarks must be identified as such.
Example prompts and AI outputs
Example prompts are starting points readers can adapt. They do not promise a particular response or demonstrate that a tool has passed a test.
Our standard is to label illustrative examples clearly and identify actual outputs when reporting results. Generated text, sample calculations or screenshots should not be presented as evidence of a test that did not take place. If an output is shortened or edited in a way that affects its interpretation, that change should be disclosed.
AI responses can vary between runs and may contain errors. Readers should check important information against reliable sources.
AI assistance and human review
We use AI to assist with content preparation. Depending on the article, this may include organizing information, drafting or refining wording. Every article receives human review before publication, and the ChinaAI Team remains responsible for the final content.
Our review standards focus on the accuracy of the main claims, the support offered by sources, the clarity of the instructions and the distinction between evidence and illustration. AI-generated text is not, by itself, a source that verifies a factual claim.
When AI-generated material is central to an example or result, the article should explain its role so readers can interpret it accurately.
Independence and commercial relationships
ChinaAI is an independent information website. Access to our content is free. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by or operated by DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi or their providers.
We currently have no affiliate arrangements, sponsored content or commercial partnerships connected with our coverage. Our editorial decisions are guided by relevance to readers and the available evidence.
If we introduce advertising or commercial relationships in the future, we will disclose them where relevant and identify paid placements clearly. Payment will not entitle a provider to a favorable editorial conclusion.
Updates and corrections
AI products can change, including their features, pricing, limits and availability. Our aim is to update content when we identify a material change or factual error. A publication or update date does not mean every feature has been retested on that date.
When a correction materially changes an article’s meaning or conclusion, our standard is to explain the correction on the affected page. Minor spelling, formatting or broken-link fixes may be made without a separate note.
We welcome correction requests, supporting evidence and questions about this policy. Email [email protected] or visit our Contact page. For a correction request, please include:
- The URL of the page concerned.
- The statement, instruction or section that needs attention.
- A supporting source or a description of what you observed, including the service and date when relevant.
We assess requests against the available evidence and correct or clarify content as appropriate. Our Privacy Policy explains how we handle information you share when contacting us.